Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: surprising result in correspondence games

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 13:54:20 09/14/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 14, 2004 at 14:53:18, Uri Blass wrote:

>I found that the swiss IM  Bela Toth scored 9/11(7 wins and 4 draws) in the
>first board of the olympiad.
>
>For me it is a very surprising result.
>
>I know that very good results are possible because a lot of players do not use
>computers for many hours per move and I did +7 =3 against weak opposition in the
>preliminary olympiad board 6 but I thought that similiar result is impossible
>against first board of the final(not the preliminary olympiad).
>
>It may be interesting if most of the wins of Toth were achieved by blunders that
>the top programs can avoid after a long time(at least it was the case for most
>of my wins when I did +7 =3 in the preliminary olympiad)
>
>Uri


      No pain, no gain: in correspondence chess it is often
      a matter of time you invest in choosing the next move.
      Bela Toth has perhaps worked for 20-40 hours per move, his
      opponents much less on the average and this is sufficient
      to win games with slightly better positions. BTW, it's
      not very economical to let programs run for many many
      hours for a single move. I prefer to investigate all
      sound looking moves as deep as possible by trying out
      all possible continuations. In this way you get much
      faster good results. Just my thoughts.
      Kurt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.