Author: Graham Banks
Date: 23:29:22 09/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2004 at 17:16:17, Jason Kent wrote: >On September 14, 2004 at 14:19:37, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On September 14, 2004 at 08:10:04, Jason Kent wrote: >> >>> Engine Score Ru De Li Cm Ar Ta Cr Th S-B >>>1: Ruffian_105 16.5/25 ···· === =111 01== 0=1= 1== 111 1=01 196.75 >>>2: Delfi4.5 15.5/25 === ···· ==0= 010= 11= 1011 1=0 1111 176.00 >>>3: List512 15.0/26 =000 ==1= ···· 010 0111 111= ===1 1== 172.75 >>>4: Cm9000Jk3 14.5/25 10== 101= 101 ···· 1=0 011 0110 =1== 178.75 >>>5: Aristarch 4.50 12.0/26 1=0= 00= 1000 0=1 ···· =01= 0101 0111 140.50 >>>6: Tao56 10.5/25 0== 0100 000= 100 =10= ···· 11=1 01= 121.50 >>>7: Crafty1917sse2 9.0/25 000 0=1 ===0 1001 1010 00=0 ···· 0=1 116.00 >>>8: Thinker4.6c 8.0/25 0=10 0000 0== =0== 1000 10= 1=0 ···· 102.75 >>> >>>101 of 420 games played >> >> >>Can Ruffian 1.05 hold on? I say no! >>Graham. > >Ruffian, delfi, and list are still all ahead of my new cm9k setting. this >setting probably isn't very good. Hi Jason, have you tried CM9000 Assassin? Ongoing testing done by Ray against both CM9000 settings AND other programs is consistently showing it as possibly the best setting. Might even do better than Judge II or TO5 although Kurt wasn't overly impressed with its early results when he tried it out. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.