Author: Jason Kent
Date: 05:10:40 09/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2004 at 02:29:22, Graham Banks wrote: >On September 14, 2004 at 17:16:17, Jason Kent wrote: > >>On September 14, 2004 at 14:19:37, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On September 14, 2004 at 08:10:04, Jason Kent wrote: >>> >>>> Engine Score Ru De Li Cm Ar Ta Cr Th S-B >>>>1: Ruffian_105 16.5/25 ···· === =111 01== 0=1= 1== 111 1=01 196.75 >>>>2: Delfi4.5 15.5/25 === ···· ==0= 010= 11= 1011 1=0 1111 176.00 >>>>3: List512 15.0/26 =000 ==1= ···· 010 0111 111= ===1 1== 172.75 >>>>4: Cm9000Jk3 14.5/25 10== 101= 101 ···· 1=0 011 0110 =1== 178.75 >>>>5: Aristarch 4.50 12.0/26 1=0= 00= 1000 0=1 ···· =01= 0101 0111 140.50 >>>>6: Tao56 10.5/25 0== 0100 000= 100 =10= ···· 11=1 01= 121.50 >>>>7: Crafty1917sse2 9.0/25 000 0=1 ===0 1001 1010 00=0 ···· 0=1 116.00 >>>>8: Thinker4.6c 8.0/25 0=10 0000 0== =0== 1000 10= 1=0 ···· 102.75 >>>> >>>>101 of 420 games played >>> >>> >>>Can Ruffian 1.05 hold on? I say no! >>>Graham. >> >>Ruffian, delfi, and list are still all ahead of my new cm9k setting. this >>setting probably isn't very good. > > >Hi Jason, >have you tried CM9000 Assassin? Ongoing testing done by Ray against both CM9000 >settings AND other programs is consistently showing it as possibly the best >setting. Might even do better than Judge II or TO5 although Kurt wasn't overly >impressed with its early results when he tried it out. >Graham. Nope, I haven't tried assassin yet. I like your original Judge setting still.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.