Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Results of Pro Deo [Time Control] parameter

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 05:56:24 09/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 15, 2004 at 01:22:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On September 14, 2004 at 23:18:48, Antonio Dieguez wrote:
>
>>>One curiosity appeared in the match forcing me to manually edit the result: the
>>>Arena GUI was set to resign if both opponents reach a score of -9.0, well due to
>>>a certain blindness by BOTH opponents (though no one resigned) the following
>>>position came up:
>>>
>>>[D]8/6kP/8/8/8/2p1K3/2B5/8 w - - 0 81
>>>
>>>And both List 5.12 and Pro Deo (as white) thought white was dead won, and gave
>>>+10 scores for white. The GUI kicked in and declared Pro Deo the winner. I set
>>>this to a draw of course.
>>
>>Not seeing it is a draw just because a black pawn? what a pity.
>>
>>No problem here.
>>
>
>******Also no problem for CM9_T05 on P4 1.8/32 MB hash******
>
>Time	Depth	Score	Positions	Moves
>0:00	6/13	0.04	296978		81.Bd3 Kh8 82.Be4 c2 83.Bxc2 Kg7
>					84.Be4 Kh8 85.Bf5
>0:01	7/14	0.04	461118		81.Bd3 Kh8 82.Be4 c2 83.Bxc2 Kg7
>					84.Be4 Kh8 85.Bf5
>0:02	8/15	0.04	881776		81.Bd3 Kh8 82.Be4 c2 83.Bxc2 Kg7

Actually, the only other engine to have any strange evaluation, other than the
ones the played, was Nimzo 8 which gave it a +3.

                                        Albert



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.