Author: Javier Ros Padilla
Date: 10:15:22 09/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2004 at 14:53:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>I found that the swiss IM Bela Toth scored 9/11(7 wins and 4 draws) in the
>first board of the olympiad.
>
>For me it is a very surprising result.
>
>I know that very good results are possible because a lot of players do not use
>computers for many hours per move and I did +7 =3 against weak opposition in the
>preliminary olympiad board 6 but I thought that similiar result is impossible
>against first board of the final(not the preliminary olympiad).
>
>It may be interesting if most of the wins of Toth were achieved by blunders that
>the top programs can avoid after a long time(at least it was the case for most
>of my wins when I did +7 =3 in the preliminary olympiad)
>
>Uri
In the past you have also got "very surprising results" for that time using
computers.
I think that the combined power of a chess computer program or programs with a
chess master that leads it can get a very high ELO rating.
If the human has master level and knows the strenghts and weaknesses of
computers, he can do a perfect symbiosis to play chess. The computer can provide
many ideas to the master, check the viability of plans, and many other things.
Some correspondence players only use the computer to avoid blunders, on the
other side, other ones plays all the computer's advices, in these cases this
simbiosis is bad and the level of the team is near to the level of both players
separately.
In my first and modest experience in Correspondence Chess, I have the following
three games, where the cooperation of human and computer has worked very well,
raising my level of play quite a lot.
Best regards.
Javier Ros
[Event "AP-2004-Q-00005"]
[Site "Chessfriend.com"]
[Date "2004.02.11"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Ros, Javier"]
[Black "Sondermann, Dirk"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1900"]
[BlackElo "2100"]
[PlyCount "61"]
1.f4 d5 2.Nf3 g6 3.e3 Bg7 4.Be2 Nf6 5.O-O O-O 6.d3 c5
7.Qe1 Nc6 8.Nc3 d4 9.Nd1 dxe3 10.Nxe3 Qc7 11.Nc4 Nd4 12.Bd1 Bg4
13.Nce5 Nxf3+ 14.Bxf3 Bxf3 15.Rxf3 Nd5 16.Rh3 e6 17.Bd2 Rfd8 18.Qh4 h6
19.Re1 Ne7 20.g4 b5 21.Nf3 b4 22.f5 gxf5 23.Bxh6 Ng6 24.Qg5 fxg4
25.Qxg4 Qd6 26.Re4 Bxb2 27.Nh4 Bd4+ 28.Kg2 e5 29.Nf5 Qe6 30.Qh5 a5
31.Bg7 { Black resigns.; Enddate: 9/12/2004 } 1-0
[Event "AP-2004-Q-00005"]
[Site "Chessfriend.com"]
[Date "2004.02.11"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Vosahlík, Jiri"]
[Black "Ros, Javier"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[WhiteElo "2456"]
[BlackElo "1900"]
[PlyCount "93"]
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 cxd4 6.Nb5 a6
7.Nbxd4 Nge7 8.Bd3 Qc7 9.Nxc6 Nxc6 10.Bf4 Nb4 11.O-O Bd7 12.Qd2 Be7
13.Rfc1 O-O 14.Bg5 Qd8 15.Bxe7 Qxe7 16.Be2 Bb5 17.Bd1 a5 18.c3 Nc6
19.a4 Ba6 20.Bc2 Qc5 21.Rab1 Qb6 22.Re1 h6 23.b4 axb4 24.cxb4 Bc4
25.b5 Nb8 26.Nd4 Nd7 27.Ra1 Qa5 28.Qf4 Qd8 29.h4 Qe7 30.Qg4 Nc5
31.Re3 Kh8 32.Rg3 Rg8 33.Raa3 Ne4 34.Bxe4 dxe4 35.Qxe4 Bd5 36.Qf4 Qb4
37.Kh2 Rac8 38.Ra1 Rc4 39.Rg4 b6 40.Rd1 Qe7 41.Qe3 Qb4 42.Qf4 Qe7
43.Rd3 Rxa4 44.Rdg3 Kh7 45.Qe3 Rc4 46.Nc6 Qc5 47.Qxc5 { The players agreed to a
draw.; Enddate: 9/13/2004 } 1/2-1/2
[Event "AP-2004-Q-00005"]
[Site "Chessfriend.com"]
[Date "2004.02.11"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Ros, Javier"]
[Black "Safaryan, Armen"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1900"]
[BlackElo "2172"]
[PlyCount "75"]
1.e4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.e5 Ne4 4.Nce2 Nc5 5.d4 Ne6 6.f4 g6
7.Nf3 c5 8.c3 Nc6 9.Be3 c4 10.g4 Ng7 11.Rg1 h5 12.h3 hxg4
13.hxg4 b5 14.b3 Bd7 15.Ng5 Qc8 16.Bg2 f6 17.Qc2 fxg5 18.Qxg6+ Kd8
19.f5 Be8 20.Qxg5 cxb3 21.axb3 b4 22.Bxd5 bxc3 23.Rc1 c2 24.Rxc2 Qa6
25.Bc4 Qa5+ 26.Bd2 Nb4 27.Kf1 Rc8 28.d5 Rh2 29.Qf4 Rh3 30.Nd4 Bd7
31.e6 Be8 32.d6 exd6 33.f6 Rf3+ 34.Qxf3 Qa1+ 35.Kg2 Qxd4 36.e7+ Bxe7
37.fxe7+ Kc7 38.Bxb4 { Black resigns.; Enddate: 4/2/2004 } 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.