Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Apologies for the ambiguity

Author: GuyHaworth

Date: 12:27:40 09/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 15, 2004 at 12:20:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On September 15, 2004 at 11:03:04, GuyHaworth wrote:
>
>>
>>Interesting, thanks.
>>
>>With 5-man EGTs, the tactic is to go for the P-promo, opting later for the R-sac
>>to dropshift to a won KRPKR endgame: mate on m99.  'The cost of certainty' is
>>12m.
>>
>>Without, the chosen route is just to drive the passed Pawn: mate on m87.
>>
>>The latter compares v favourably with the DTM-optimal mate, as provided by Rob,
>>on m86 with 6-man EGTs.
>>
>>g
>
>
>This was a mate in 17, not 87...  as my egtb output showed...


Oops: sorry!  I was quoting the move-numbers as extrapolated from the game, not
restarting move-numbers from the given position.

Everything is relative:  all my move-numbers were as if in the game.

Yes, the mate from the position was only 17 moves long.

Guy








This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.