Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: surprising result in correspondence games

Author: J.Dufek

Date: 01:01:56 09/16/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 14, 2004 at 17:19:56, Uri Blass wrote:

>On September 14, 2004 at 16:45:02, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On September 14, 2004 at 14:58:42, Evgeny Shu wrote:
>>
>>>I wonder where is the interest if computer analysing the game and not the human
>>>? :)
>>
>>Without wishing to criticize, I ask myself the exact same thing. I'm not going
>>to enter the whole "is it cheating?" debate, since that's not even the issue.
>>Still, what fun can it be to sit there feeding a computer's moves, no matter how
>>well you administered the time and engines used? I guess the bottom line is what
>>is more important to you: the results or the actual playing?
>>
>>                                          Albert
>
>In my case I was asked again and again to play for Israel after previous good
>results.
>
>The next tournament is going to be harder and I am playing in board 3 of the
>final of the europe championship.
>
>I am going to play by mail and not by email so I am going to have more time per
>move.
>
>Uri
Not true. You don't need more time for move. Yours computer does! It's different
....



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.