Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: C (compiler) question

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 10:18:48 09/16/04

Go up one level in this thread

On September 16, 2004 at 03:12:33, Tony Werten wrote:

>Yes. I needed a rewrite anyway, and Borland doesn't seem willing to produce a
>64bit compiler in the near future, wich is a big disadvantage since I wanted to
>use the Kogge-Stone stuff rather than the 0x88 I used until now. ( actually, it
>will be a kind of a mixture)

How has the Kogge-Stone stuff been working for you? I was never able to get it
to work efficiently enough (rotated bitboards were at least 2x faster). Of
course, I didn't write MMX assembly like Gerd, so obviously it won't be as fast
as his approach.

• Re: C (compiler) question Tony Werten 22:36:46 09/16/04
• Re: C (compiler) question Dann Corbit 10:53:12 09/16/04
  • Re: C (compiler) question Gerd Isenberg 12:49:36 09/16/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.