Author: John Merlino
Date: 10:53:42 09/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2004 at 13:35:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 16, 2004 at 12:47:40, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>it was blitz, may be white had better moves >> >>It's hard to tune the static eval for this kind of position : >>[d]8/8/8/2N4r/2kP2p1/Pp2P3/1P3PK1/8 w - - 0 69 >>Shredder give >+2.30 here and may be black is better ... > > > I don't think that Black is better. In my opinion > it is only White to have winning chances here. > Kurt > > > >****CM9_T05 on P4 1.8/32 MB hash*** >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:01 3/10 1.83 213292 69.Kg3 Rf5 70.a4 Rf3+ 71.Kg2 Kb4 > 72.e4 Kc4 73.Ne6 Kb4 74.Ng5 Rf8 >0:01 3/10 2.32 246480 69.a4 Rf5 70.a5 Kb5 71.a6 Kb6 72.e4 > Rf3 73.e5 Rf7 >0:02 4/11 2.18 370283 69.a4 Rf5 70.a5 Kb5 71.a6 Kb6 72.Kg3 > Rf3+ 73.Kxg4 Rxf2 74.Kg3 Rc2 >0:03 5/12 2.23 651661 69.a4 Rf5 70.a5 Kb5 71.a6 Kb6 72.e4 > Rf3 73.Kg1 Rf4 74.Kf1 Rf7 75.Ke2 >0:11 6/13 1.94 2086860 69.a4 Kb4 70.Kg3 Rh1 71.a5 Rg1+ > 72.Kf4 Rb1 73.Nd3+ Kxa5 74.Kxg4 > Kb5 75.Kf5 Kc4 76.Ke4 >0:24 7/14 1.88 4870126 69.a4 Kb4 70.Kg3 Rh1 71.a5 Rb1 > 72.a6 Kb5 73.a7 Ra1 74.Kxg4 Rxa7 > 75.f4 Ra2 76.Nd3 Ra6 >0:49 8/15 1.82 10138568 69.a4 Kb4 70.a5 Kxa5 71.Nxb3+ Kb6 > 72.Nc5 Rh3 73.Nd3 Kc7 74.b4 Kc6 > 75.Ne5+ Kb5 76.Nxg4 Rh8 77.Nf6 Kxb4 >1:52 9/16 1.78 23671829 69.a4 Rh7 70.a5 Rf7 71.a6 Kb5 72.Kg3 > Rf3+ 73.Kxg4 Rxf2 74.a7 Rf8 75.Nxb3 > Ra8 76.e4 Rxa7 77.Kf5 Rf7+ 78.Ke5 > Kc6 >3:32 10/17 1.77 44809022 69.a4 Rh7 70.a5 Rf7 71.a6 Kb5 72.Kf1 > g3 73.f4 Rh7 74.f5 Kc4 75.f6 Kd5 > 76.Nxb3 Rf7 77.e4+ Kxe4 CM9_SKR on an AMD 2500 gives a very similar score. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.