Author: Graham Banks
Date: 03:06:31 09/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 2004 at 04:19:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On September 17, 2004 at 03:33:13, Graham Banks wrote: > >>Athlon XP2000 >>256mb hash each (or closest allowed by each program) >>3,4,5 piece tablebases >>All using Fritz Powerbook tournament book (maximum variety, minimum 5 games for >>a move to be played, no learning) >>40 moves in 40 minutes repeating. >>Ponder off >>Tournament run under Deep Fritz 8 GUI >> >> >>The top three finishers aside from CM9000 Judge II and CM 10th Edition (which >>have already qualified) will progress to the final stage which will be played at >>40/120 with the powerbook settings optimised. At this stage that means List 512, >>Pro Deo 1.0 and SOS 4 will be playing in the final. However……..there are >>approximately 100 games that I will now be rerunning due to unsatisfactory >>openings caused by the powerbook settings used. I don’t expect this to have much >>effect on final placings, but time will tell! >> >> >>STANDINGS >> >>57.5 - CM9000 Judge II >>48.5 - CM 10th Edition (default) >>46.0 - List 512 >>45.5 - Pro Deo 1.0 >>44.5 - SOS 4 >> >>43.0 - Gandalf 5.1 >>42.5 - Delfi 4.5 > >But a 100 games could place Gandalf 5.1 or Delfi 4.5 in front of Pro Deo 1.0 and >SOS 4. Therefore, I do think that these 100 games could have an impact on the >final placings, unless you disregard the outcome. > >Jorge Hi Jorge, let's just wait and see what happens. As all the games being replayed had totally unsatisfactory openings originally, the final standings will be determined AFTER the rerun games. I'm hoping that Gandalf 5.1 will miss out to Pro Deo 1.0 and SOS 4 as Gandalf is the only program I've struck problems with. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.