Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Next step for Com. chess programs: CONNECT TO ICS SERVERS!!

Author: Lawrence S. Tamarkin

Date: 08:09:17 01/08/99

Go up one level in this thread


On January 08, 1999 at 09:43:53, Laurence Chen wrote:

>On January 08, 1999 at 08:11:53, Matthew Herman wrote:
>
>>On January 08, 1999 at 03:54:51, Mike Saavedra wrote:
>>
>>>Already I've seen ChessVision, Chess.net, ChessPartner and to some extent
>>>Chessmaster (MPlayer sucks though) use its interface to play online. Hopefully
>>>ChessBase (Fritz/Junior) , Rebel, Genius and other high level chess programs
>>>should make it possible to use their GUI to play online. To all programmers out >there, would that be difficult? Mindscape should also get rid of CMLive on
>>>MPlayer and make their program Telnet (ICC/FICS) compatible. The convinience and >familiarity of GUI's would be definately a plus! Opinions??
>>
>>All nice indeed, yet firstly it would have to create an "ics mode" to prvent
>>cheating with the program in use. Secondly, Rebel is still dos.. this I think
>>would only be convenient for Windows. Yes, the chessnet, chesspartner and
>>chessvision interfaces are *very* lacking.. But then again that wasn't really
>>the main purpose of a program.. To see a *really* good ics interface put into a
>>top commercial program would require it being shaped around blitzin or
>>winboard.. (my preference is blitzin).. and what if you are in blitz.. some of
>>the programs it is hard to move pieces .. i.e. when using blitzin you can
>>"theoretically" make 10 moves in 1 second.. with a gui like genius or rebel or
>>fritz maybe 1 move in 2 seconds.. so you are already at a "disadvantage".. also
>>this would probably encourage people to find new ways of cheating.. (which might
>>be even easier, as they are ALREADY in the program).. Just a few thoughts,
>>although it is still a good idea..
>However, if such interface would be created it would allow engine vs engine more
>easier for Windows programs, and there would be no need for the the Auto232
>device. I think that using an networking device would be more convenient and
>appropriate.

Wouldn't Lag (and/or other Network related problems), make testing just as
combersome, or create new problems not anticipated as yet?


mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.