Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:47:51 09/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 2004 at 18:55:53, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 17, 2004 at 18:05:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >[snip] >>Very true, which is why I'm so happy that he included his source code - at least >>these results can be verified. > >I think that this remark bears emphasis. > >The hallmark of any good science is that it should be repeatable. > >"Cold fusion" anyone? Doesn't always work that way. Crafty is a case in point. How many of the "it doesn't get 1.7x exactly with two processors" have we seen here? Even though source is available...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.