Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 2 stupid pondering programming questions

Author: martin fierz

Date: 07:44:03 09/19/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 18, 2004 at 11:12:25, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On September 18, 2004 at 04:07:19, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>On September 17, 2004 at 20:38:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>>I assume you type "ponderhit" when you ponder the correct move?  Why not type
>>>the move itself?  Fewer keystrokes.  :)
>>
>>that's the UCI specification...
>>
>>cheers
>>  martin
>
>
>As I make a gagging/puking sound, I ride off into the sunset again, content in
>the knowledge that winboard doesn't do this kind of crap.  :)

:-)
i support both protocols, and actually i find the UCI protocol to be a bit
easier to support. e.g. in this case, i only have to check for "ponderhit" while
in the winboard case i need to check what move was made and whether it is the
one i was pondering on.

cheers
  martin




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.