Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 12:19:37 09/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2004 at 14:59:08, Pallav Nawani wrote: >On September 19, 2004 at 04:11:43, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On September 18, 2004 at 19:43:55, Andrew Platt wrote: >> >> >>>then you are always starting a new ply and you aren't losing any information. In >>>fact, if you don't do this you have a problem because you have information >>>relating to a *previous* move in the PV. Resetting the PV at this ply won't >>>cause the information already backed up from the previously tried moves. >> >>Yes my logic is a bit different, the child PV is not copied until the end. >> > >Interesting. Any particular reason why you don't update the PV immediately? > >Regds, >Pallav Bumming code. The instructions get run less by not updating it more. I see the attraction of the idea but won't implement it. As they say, chose to opimize after you have all the functionality you want. Not before or during. Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.