Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 15:10:09 09/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 2004 at 10:53:42, Daniel Jackson wrote: >On September 19, 2004 at 17:46:14, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>On September 19, 2004 at 16:13:16, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>On September 19, 2004 at 02:21:18, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On September 19, 2004 at 02:11:37, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 18, 2004 at 15:59:24, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>[D]rnbqkbnr/qqqqqqqq/8/8/8/8/QQQQQQQQ/RNBQKBNR w >>>>> >>>>>So far, on ply 3 (85,070,720 nodes) Shredder 7.04 on a 2.2 GHz 64 bit AMD >>>>>machine with 400 MB hash -- likes Qf2xf7+ with a score of +10.15 >>>>> >>>>>I set it for 100,000 seconds and we'll see what it says on Monday. >>>> >>>>Finished ply 4 in about 11 minutes (br.f.~3) with the same key move and a score >>>>of about +9 pawns. >>>> >>>>I estimate that it will finish ply 8 or 9. >>> >>>I appreciate the effort! Thank You! I don't know if anyone has tried or found a >>>solution to this problem? >> >>I'll let TheKing (the emperor of chechmate) think overnight (may be more) on it, >>after 1.Qaxf7 Qxf7 > >Thanks Vincent! > >I think you may find the mate very deep, but I believe 1.Qaxf7 is most likely >the *key* move...for the shortest route to a long mate. Maybe no program can >find a mate this deep, and no human OTB? Bad news, I let TK overnight on the position , when I go to work, I checked the analysis : no mate (the line was : 1.Qaxf7+ Qxf7 2.Rxa7 ... score +8), I decided to let the comp think until i go back from work, 9h later, when I checked the engine come back to depth 1 !! I decide to restart the analysis for this night after 1.Qaxf7+ Qxf7 2.Rxa7...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.