Author: martin fierz
Date: 04:23:55 09/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 2004 at 13:00:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: [snip] >I'd rather not have the test. But it is mandatory, as when I generate moves, I >either call GenerateMoves() or GenerateCheckEvasions(), and then I drop into the >code you see. If I didn't qualify the in_check part, it is possible that I >would extend way too often. IE My first call to NextMove() generates one move >that comes from the hash table. That would look like a one-reply situation when >it isn't. i see - i quite forgot that you were generating moves incrementally! i don't do that myself and so i assumed you were doing the same, although i should have known better! cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.