Author: Jason Kent
Date: 06:10:07 09/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
Why did you think to put pawn weakness high for cm9k and passed pawns high for the opposition? On September 21, 2004 at 00:54:42, Graham Banks wrote: >CM9000 ASSASSIN (Graham Banks) > >Own >Centre=105 >Mobility=110 >King Safety=175 >Passed Pawns=100 >Pawn Weakness=125 > >Opponent >Centre=105 >Mobility=110 >King Safety=150 >Passed Pawns=120 >Pawn Weakness=100 > >Material (both own and opponents) >P=1.0 >N=3.2 >B=3.2 >R=5.3 >Q=9.8 > >Selectivity=12 >A/D=0 >M/P=0 > >Material under Chessbase >P=100 >N=107 >B=107 >R=106 >Q=109
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.