Author: Graham Banks
Date: 12:20:45 09/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2004 at 09:10:07, Jason Kent wrote: >Why did you think to put pawn weakness high for cm9k and passed pawns high for >the opposition? > >On September 21, 2004 at 00:54:42, Graham Banks wrote: > >>CM9000 ASSASSIN (Graham Banks) >> >>Own >>Centre=105 >>Mobility=110 >>King Safety=175 >>Passed Pawns=100 >>Pawn Weakness=125 >> >>Opponent >>Centre=105 >>Mobility=110 >>King Safety=150 >>Passed Pawns=120 >>Pawn Weakness=100 >> >>Material (both own and opponents) >>P=1.0 >>N=3.2 >>B=3.2 >>R=5.3 >>Q=9.8 >> >>Selectivity=12 >>A/D=0 >>M/P=0 >> >>Material under Chessbase >>P=100 >>N=107 >>B=107 >>R=106 >>Q=109 Hi Jason, just based on observations of CM9000's playing style over countless games - its strengths and weaknesses. Interestingly Assassin has been the best performer of all CM9000 settings in Ray's testing if you take matches against both other CM9000 settings AND matches against other top programs into account. I'm still undecided as to whether to use Judge II or Assassin in the Super Tournament III final. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.