Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The opening book is extreamly important for a chess engine.....Jorge

Author: Dan Honeycutt

Date: 10:58:57 09/22/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 22, 2004 at 13:48:00, Volker Böhm wrote:

>Hi Uri,
>
>as Spike is still only a patzer it needs a good opening book. Spike is a little
>weak in opening positions. It does not develop its pieces well if not done by
>the book. We are working on this issue :-)
>
>By the way: I don´t think that 20-30 games prove anything. I recently had a
>funny effect: I made spike a little faster (about 7%) just to see it getting
>worst. In a fixed tournament situation (against one other engine, 100 predefined
>positions, book = off) it dropped form 51% to 42% in 200 games. The engine is
>doing exactly the same, just a little faster (I compare node count in a WM Test
>suite with fixed search depth to prove it does exactly the same).
>
>Greetings Volker

With that extra speed it became more confident of those speculative moves it
should not have been playing.  Thats what makes this hobby so much fun.  Find a
clear bug like a sign reversed in an evaluation term, fix it, and the engine
plays worse.  Go figure.

Dan H.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.