Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 15:53:51 09/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
Are you saying I should consider marking each move after its search, then back up the score value, node count, etc., then resort based on that? I could see that various parts of the subtree have generated new history heuristic scores for from/to move coordinate pairs and that a resort could affect the remaining move order. I don't currently resort at any level after the movegen at that level. I just search all the moves in the original post-movegen-sort-order. I am fine with considering doing continual resorts but worry about the overhead and the return. But with it being the all important move-ordering, what have you seen in doing these resorts in terms of improvement Stuart
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.