Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anti-Computer chess ...

Author: David H. McClain

Date: 10:04:03 09/24/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 24, 2004 at 11:00:12, Ingo Bauer wrote:

>
>>Ingo,
>>
>>I am not a good chess player, but I saw that move immediately without reading
>>your text, and strictly from an anti-computer perspective from the other side of
>>the board.
>
>So if you see at as a human, why did a programm not se it, or what happend
>there?
>
>>I have played a few GMs and excellent IM Centaur players and most of them are
>>simply expert at constricting the moves of a computer program and playing the
>>unexpected.  The word "python" comes to mind and the games can be quite
>>fascinating!
>
>Aha, so Nxh2 is unexpected and therefore black is a human. Is my conclusion out
>of your text right?
>
>Bye Ingo

Ingo,

You pose some very interesting questions.  First, without playing it back on a
program, yes, I think black is the human.  If I'm wrong, then disregard my posts
on this.

I did not want to play the game back on a computer because I wanted to use my
own intuition. Now you have my curiosity aroused, but I won't play it over on a
computer until you post the information you have!  :)  DHM



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.