Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:26:05 09/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2004 at 07:34:38, Daniel Jackson wrote: >On September 25, 2004 at 04:31:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On September 24, 2004 at 23:40:13, Albert Silver wrote: >> >> This remind me back in the old days of prearranged championship in order to >>keep the title. We all know who is the stronger and most deserving challenger. >> >>Jorge > >It's not pre-arranged....do you know would happen if it is? > >What if Leko wins? Is that pre-arranged too? I was not reffering prearrangement of the final outcome of the match , but opponent prearrangement. We all know that Peter is not the best challenger and he doesn't have the higher Elo either. Anand is the only true diserving challenger for the title. In the old days the champion was allowed to pick his opponent, and he always picked the weaker :-) Jorge >If you can't prove it then don't make such claims...it's called libel! > >Of course you're safe, as your remarks will have no influence, but it's >unethical! > >People want to enjoy the match...btw if it is fixed many GM's would realize >very quickly, and Bettson would have to call off the betting. The match would be >nullified and the audience would want a full refund...and more! >> >> >>>Just a reminder. The match for the World Championship title between Kramnik and >>>Leko starts tomorrow. Don't miss it! >>> >>>http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/twic.html >>> >>> Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.