Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:42:41 09/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2004 at 10:26:05, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On September 25, 2004 at 07:34:38, Daniel Jackson wrote:
>
>>On September 25, 2004 at 04:31:51, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On September 24, 2004 at 23:40:13, Albert Silver wrote:
>>>
>>> This remind me back in the old days of prearranged championship in order to
>>>keep the title. We all know who is the stronger and most deserving challenger.
>>>
>>>Jorge
>>
>>It's not pre-arranged....do you know would happen if it is?
>>
>>What if Leko wins? Is that pre-arranged too?
>
>I was not reffering prearrangement of the final outcome of the match , but
>opponent prearrangement. We all know that Peter is not the best challenger and
>he doesn't have the higher Elo either. Anand is the only true diserving
>challenger for the title. In the old days the champion was allowed to pick his
>opponent, and he always picked the weaker :-)
>
>Jorge
Kramnik didn't choose a thing. Leko is playing him because he qualified to do so
via the qualification matches, so I'm unsure as to what you mean.
Albert
>
>>If you can't prove it then don't make such claims...it's called libel!
>>
>>Of course you're safe, as your remarks will have no influence, but it's
>>unethical!
>>
>>People want to enjoy the match...btw if it is fixed many GM's would realize
>>very quickly, and Bettson would have to call off the betting. The match would be
>>nullified and the audience would want a full refund...and more!
>>>
>>>
>>>>Just a reminder. The match for the World Championship title between Kramnik and
>>>>Leko starts tomorrow. Don't miss it!
>>>>
>>>>http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/twic.html
>>>>
>>>> Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.