Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 18:40:14 09/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2004 at 00:21:35, Sergei S. Markoff wrote: >There are a lot of interesting ideas in a book by the authors of Kaissa. >They offer to include in quiscence some, but not all checks. The classes of >checks that they offer + some my additions. > >1. Checks with capture >2. Checks with threat to take some piece with see>0. >3. Discovered checks >4. Checks with rook or queen stands close to king with see>=0. >5. +1 additional check in each branch of quiescence. Whenever I try to introduce anything other than captures in my quiescence, my solution count goes way down. The reason? By generating all moves, instead of just captures, I end up doing way too much. I need to revisit this, but past testing has not been fruitful. >Using this classes of checks can provide limited tree growth with very good >tactical results. > >I need your results to compare.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.