Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 22:04:52 09/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2004 at 15:53:53, David B Weller wrote:
> 2 -223 0.01 375 {12} Kf1 Re2
> 3 -205 0.02 1061 {13} Kf1 Re2 Kg1
>4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - bm Qxf4; id "WAC.141";
>
> 4 -239 0.05 3815 {18} Kf1 Re2 Qc3 b4
> 5+ -199 0.18 16983 {23} Kf1
> 5 -185 0.35 36630 {23} Kf1 a5 Qb1 a4 Bc2
> 6 -206 0.86 91286 {25} Kf1 Re2 Qb1 Rd2 Kg1 Nd3
> 7 -175 2.48 248962 {27} Kf1 Re2 Qb1 Rd2 Qc1 Rd3 Be5 Bxe5 dxe5
> 8+ -135 7.29 832695 {29} Qxf4
> 8 299 9.88 1150509 {29} Qxf4 Bxf4 Rxh5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bh6 Rxh6 Qh2+ Rxh2
> 9 299 13.58 1503202 {29} Qxf4 Bxf4 Rxh5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bh6 Rxh6 Qh2+ Rxh2
>10+ 339 25.34 2971184 {30} Qxf4
>Knps: 94[r=745471 q=4971821(86%)]Qxf4
>fh=83% bf=3.17
>ext: ck=107333 p7=1950 mt=1051 1r=1488 re=2311 delay=0 good=0
>red: nm=93529 fc=16253558 zg=0
>ht=88%
>move c1f4
>
David,
Hey that's great -- only 7.29 seconds. Congratulations.
Okay, so what are the goods? How did you do it?
Can you repost your web URL for the GES that did the above and
cite the relevant portions of code you believe are responsible for
your superior time for Qxf4!
Stuart
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.