Author: Daniel Shawul
Date: 23:45:17 09/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2004 at 10:15:32, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On September 27, 2004 at 02:15:42, Daniel Shawul wrote: > >>On September 27, 2004 at 01:03:39, Sergei S. Markoff wrote: >> >>>>Sergei -- when you refer to the leaf and pre-leaf we assume you >>>>mean depth == 0 and depth == 1 respectively. Please correct this >>>>if we are wrong. >>> >>>You're right. The main idea is to decrease rate of cases in which after threat >>>we're going into quiescence with it's null move. Pre-leaf (depth==1) nodes are >>>important because it's preferable to detect threat chains. >> >>after reading what you and tord wrote some time ago on this extesnion, >>i tried it. First time i did for the whole big depths and it slowed down >>my search considerably. then i restrained it to depth < 2*UNITDEPTH >>and it is working fine now. >> >>Another thing i tried is , i search the "mate threat mov
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.