Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 14:59:38 09/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2004 at 16:26:02, Steve B wrote: >So, even if we took 20% of THAT figure >>there would be AT LEAST over 1000 posters/lurkers. > > >less then 90 posters/lukers donated out of perhaps 1000 active >members(poster's/lucrkers) >a truely disgraceful amount > >for the life of me,i cant understand where it is written that if something is on >the net..it must be free.. by an act of god > >please consider before you decide to wash your hands of the CCC ... > >try setting a deadline of Feb 1 for the CCC to be a fee service >all those donating BEFORE the deadline will be "grand fathered" in for a free >full year membership(say $50 per annum) >this will have the effect of at least enticing those whom have yet to contribute >to perhaps donate $5-$10 because they will reason it is better then paying $50. >this alone could generate the needed $2500 remaining($4500 less $2500 already >received) > >then we have locked in the CCC for another year >with the CCC becoming a a paid service after Feb 1 > >> >>As far as moderators... I have asked if all the current CCC and CTF moderators >>would stay on until February > >ok..thanks for the reply >Best >Steveb I like that -- the carrot with the hammer approach -- pay me now or pay me more later. Spoken like a true "CPA" ;>)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.