Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 00:07:23 09/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2004 at 02:53:42, Russell Reagan wrote: >On September 29, 2004 at 01:47:50, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>Thats why you assign 'head' moderators. Get other people who are in good >>standing that wouldn't mind doing this stuff to do it. Have 2 or so mods take >>care of the more frequent problems, have 2-3 more admins running the board and >>keeping the peace so to speak, as well as planning nominations (which isn't that >>often). The message board software can handle the lost password problems as well >>as the change of email address issue. >> >>Should allow you to kick back and take it easy while keeping an eye on >>everything. >> >>I really would like to see the search feature of the new board in action here. >>It would help out a LOT. There have been countless times I've wanted to look up >>old posts but couldn't. This would easily solve that. > > >I think your proposal misses the point. The primary reason we are in this >situation is a lack of funds, not a lack of willingness to put up with >headaches. > >I'm not even sure the situation would be improved overall. The transition is not >free. Someone has to install and maintain the new software. The bandwidth >requirements increase. Comparing message indexes of the two boards, the >bandwidth requirements increase 2x. Comparing messages of approximately equal >length of content, the bandwidth requirement increases 20x. How much bandwidth does CCC currently take? I've heard "alot" and "high" but that doesn't really pinpoint things. The $4,400 / 6 months estimate would essentially be the price of a full T1 right off the hop. I can't imagine any text-based forum to come close to using a full T1 -- even in peak login times. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.