Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 07:55:14 09/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2004 at 06:16:30, Russell Reagan wrote: >On September 29, 2004 at 05:03:32, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>There are about 27,000 counter-strike gaming servers running on peoples >>computers all over the USA. I have my webpages DNS going straight to my cable >>modem and run my FTP as well as email from my own server. No problems there. >>I've had my ISPs technicians come in (fixing cable modem problems) and have seen >>my entire setup.. which includes my server routing out multiple computers >>through my connection. They really couldn't care less. >> >>I seriously doubt an ISP is going to care if you run a forum off your >>connection. You pay for the connection and you can download/upload constanly if >>you want. The forum is going to be MUCH less harsh on the connection than that. > > >I don't think that is a good way to run a website. I think this is what Steve is >trying to say. He has done a quality job running this website. There are plenty >of people willing to take over, but the quality is likely to suffer. No offense, >but your proposal is such an example. It may work fine, or it may go offline >everytime the "sort of static" IP address changes, or when the ISP decides >you're violating the acceptable usage policy, or when your electricity goes out, >or when you need to replace your motherboard, or when you need to replace your >motherboard but can't afford a new motherboard until next month because you had >to buy a new air conditioner unit this month, or whatever else happens at your >home that a business backed website is better prepared to handle. First of all, I have a main AC. My apartment complex will fix that, not me. Motherboards are cheap and I have many of them. I have a UPS so electricity isn't a problem. IP changes aren't a problem, I have a program that communicates with dyndns.org to change my DNS entry the instant my IP does.. and fortunately since I've had my cable modem at my new location the IP has not changed. Also, the ISP isn't going to get mad because I'm running forums all of a sudden, they don't have a problem with the slew of other stuff I run. I was running a business too... so had all of this settled long, long ago. >>There should be little reason to post pictures, but I'm sure it will happen as a >>rare occurence. It shouldn't be hard on bandwidth though (being so rare). > > >The difference is that a CCC post is basically the message content slapped >between some pre-tags, while the other uses all kinds of HTML and small images >to look pretty. A picture (even a small one) is worth a thousand words :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.