Author: Dan Andersson
Date: 17:52:57 09/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2004 at 19:26:26, Graham Banks wrote: >In the game Aristarch 4.50 v CM10th Creep (which I’ll post later) from Super >Tournament III Final, this was the position once both came out of book. First of >all I’d like to know what theory considers the evaluation to be and secondly I’d >like to know your thoughts if you feel qualified to give them. Was CM10th Creep >undone by a dodgy opening line? The short answer is IMO that it allowed the Keres attack. White gets a tremendous initiative. After that black has only one move option that doesn't have a bad record in chess praxis. That is 6. ... e5. After that I can only criticize whites moves. F.ex: 11. Rg3 or 18. Kb1 instead of the moves played. This is all a bit dated theoretically from my side. Let's see if someone else can also help out. MvH Dan Andersson > >1.e4, c5; 2.Nf3, e6; 3.d4, cd; 4.Nxd4, Nf6; 5.Nc3, d6; 6.g4, h6; 7.h4, Nc6; >8.Rg1, h5; 9.gh, Nxh5; 10.Bg5, Nf6; 11.Qd2, Qb6; 12.Nb3, a6; 13.Be2, Bd7; 14.h5, >Nxh5; 15.Rh1, g6; 16.0-0-0, Qxf2; 17.e5, Qf5; 18.ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.