Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:22:25 09/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2004 at 10:50:28, Jason Kent wrote: >On September 30, 2004 at 08:59:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "?"] >>[Round "-"] >>[White "?"] >>[Black "?"] >>[Result "*"] >> >>1. e4 g6 2. Nc3 Bg7 3. Nf3 Bxc3 4. dxc3 d6 5. Bc4 Nc6 6. O-O Bd7 7. Re1 e5 >>8. Ng5 Nh6 9.Nf3 Ng8 10.Ng5 Nh6 11.Nf3 Ng8 >>* >> >>What is your opinion? >>Could white get an advantage? >> >>It seems that white is clearly better and black(gnuchess) blundered by 3...Bxc3 >>but I cannot find a way for white to get a clear advantage after some analysis >>with Ruffian1.0.1 and it gives scores of less than 0.5 pawn for white in lines >>like >>9.Qd5 0-0. >> >>Uri > >Did he finish the game? Many people can get out of the opening book ahead by >half a pawn with white. of course he finished the game. You can see that it was 3 time repetition and 3 time repetition is a draw. The point is that gnuchess did not try to win the game because it evaluated repetition as the best thing for it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.