Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 11:24:44 09/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2004 at 10:48:09, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >[D]4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - bm Qxf4; id >"WAC.141"; > >Falcon uses aggressive prunings, yet it finds the correct move instantly (0.06 >seconds). I think having appropriate extensions is the important thing here. > >Falcon 2.5.2.11 on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+, 1999MHz, 1024MB: >depth time nodes nps score variation > 3/9 0.00 0k 581k -2.62 1.g2f1++ > 3/9 0.00 0k 788k -2.14 1.g2f1 e8e2 2.f1g1 > 4/15 0.00 2k 2086k -2.44 1.g2f1-- > 4/15 0.00 2k 2741k -2.70 1.g2f1 e8e2 2.h1h2 g8f8 > 5/17 0.00 5k 5151k -2.40 1.g2f1++ > 5/17 0.01 8k 544k -2.17 1.g2f1 e8e2 2.h1h2 f4d3 3.c1h6 e2e1 > 4.f1g2 > 6/20 0.05 22k 499k -2.47 1.g2f1-- > 6/20 0.05 27k 605k -2.56 1.g2f1 a7a5 2.h1g1 e8e2 3.c1c3 g8f8 > 6/20 0.06 35k 571k -2.55 1.c1f4++ > 6/20 0.08 39k 509k -1.87 1.c1f4++ > 6/20 0.08 45k 577k -0.07 1.c1f4++ > 6/20 0.09 55k 597k 3.38 1.c1f4 d6f4 2.h4h5 g6h5 3.h1h5 f4h6 > 4.h5h6 c7h2 5.h6h2 > 7/21 0.25 145k 582k 3.68 1.c1f4++ > 7/25 0.59 338k 569k 4.28 1.c1f4++ > 7/27 2.08 1161k 558k 6.08 1.c1f4++ > 7/34 20.55 11607k 564k 13.28 1.c1f4++ > 7/35 65.14 39412k 605k 49.28 1.c1f4++ > 7/37 82.27 51880k 630k #6 1.c1f4 d6f4 2.h4h5 g6h5 3.h1h5 f4h6 > 4.h5h6 c7h2 5.g2h2 d7d8 6.h6h8 Omid -- do you search moves-that-check at the first ply of quiescence? Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.