Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 21:13:09 10/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2004 at 23:58:00, Chris Welty wrote: >On October 01, 2004 at 18:18:41, Daniel Jackson wrote: > >>On October 01, 2004 at 15:35:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On October 01, 2004 at 12:49:21, ThatsIt wrote: >>> >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Shredder 8 09.0 - 31.0 (+ 4 =10 -26) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Shredder 8 16.5 - 23.5 (+ 9 =15 -16) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Shredder 8 20.0 - 20.0 (+14 =12 -14) >>> >>>yes. ANY style is better then the default style against s8. >>>as your changes show. >>> >>>what we need is creativity of the people. >>> >>>pro deo has much potential. >>>how else could you explain that the results change so drastically. >> >>These stats are within normal margin of error.....nothing drastic whatsoever. >> >>Dann will do the math for you if you insist. > >These stats are NOT within the normal margin of error. Let's have Dann do the >math. Bet you wouldn't believe that a stronger program could lose 10 straight games yet it has happened. I also know that S8 is stonger than Rebel...although Rebel certainly is a strong program. These new settings may have made a difference in score, but it could be for other reasons...Simply put there isn't enough games to be certain of anything, but it appears that these settings might be the reason...and I say might...we don't know yet.. I don't know and you don't know....could be book wins and losses...we don't know, we have no games to look at...see to see why this result occurred.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.