Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 22:07:19 10/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2004 at 00:01:50, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >I made this change and recouped nicely. > >Reducing function calls, etc. This plus some hard extension limits that prevent huge buildups of extensions (the exact rule is no more than one full ply extension per every 2 ply)... The above ideas pushed the program to be able to solve WAC with full null move in about epsilon over a minute on an old 1ghz P3 (down from 95-100 seconds) and retained the overall WAC level at a new record (for me) of 251. I think these two ideas came from readings (maybe misreadings?) of Uri and Bob's replies over the last few days... so thanks and sorry if there is a misinterpretation of anything. Each program seems to derive an improvement from totally unique sets of changes.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.