Author: ThatsIt
Date: 23:33:21 10/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2004 at 00:13:09, Daniel Jackson wrote: >On October 01, 2004 at 23:58:00, Chris Welty wrote: > >>On October 01, 2004 at 18:18:41, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>On October 01, 2004 at 15:35:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>On October 01, 2004 at 12:49:21, ThatsIt wrote: >>>> >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Shredder 8 09.0 - 31.0 (+ 4 =10 -26) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Shredder 8 16.5 - 23.5 (+ 9 =15 -16) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Shredder 8 20.0 - 20.0 (+14 =12 -14) >>>> >>>>yes. ANY style is better then the default style against s8. >>>>as your changes show. >>>> >>>>what we need is creativity of the people. >>>> >>>>pro deo has much potential. >>>>how else could you explain that the results change so drastically. >>> >>>These stats are within normal margin of error.....nothing drastic whatsoever. >>> >>>Dann will do the math for you if you insist. >> >>These stats are NOT within the normal margin of error. Let's have Dann do the >>math. > >Bet you wouldn't believe that a stronger program could lose 10 straight games >yet it has happened. I also know that S8 is stonger than Rebel...although Rebel >certainly is a strong program. > >These new settings may have made a difference in score, but it could be for >other reasons...Simply put there isn't enough games to be certain of anything, >but it appears that these settings might be the reason...and I say might...we >don't know yet.. > >I don't know and you don't know....could be book wins and losses...we don't >know, we have no games to look at...see to see why this result occurred. agree, to less games until now but in a few weeks ProDeo will have played 200 games each i know that 200 games are not enough nevertheless if Pro Deo (GS2 or GS3) will perform in the same way further on i will play much more games in the future best G.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.