Author: David Dahlem
Date: 08:43:41 10/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2004 at 11:28:22, Mike Byrne wrote: >On October 02, 2004 at 11:20:46, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On October 02, 2004 at 10:59:48, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>On October 02, 2004 at 07:46:08, Andrew Platt wrote: >>> >>>>On October 02, 2004 at 00:05:32, Wilhelm Hudetz wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi All, >>>>> >>>>>in this position (Game 60min+15sec)King3.33 didn´t find the right move in a >>>>>accetable time. >>>>>King plays 55...Th1 and lost the game. No other Top-engine >>>>>and the most good amateur-engines have a probem and >>>>>plays 55...Kg4 after some seconds. >>>>>To many games from King3.33 was lost to those Blackouts in endgames. >>>> >>>>Rh1 looks very wrong but neither Crafty or Shredder 5 like Kg4 - perhaps they >>>>have no desire for R+P v Q endgames! Both of them prefer Re2. >>>> >>>>Andy. >>> >>> >>>The Crafty I have plays Kg4! >>> >>>Crafty v19.17 SE SSDF [Standard] (2 cpus) >>>SE code disabled >>> >>>White(1): 8/8/P7/7R/5k2/1K5p/7r/8 b - - 0 1 >>>Black(1): >>>Black(1): >>>Black(1): st 300 >>>search time set to 300.00. >>>Black(1): go >>> time surplus 0.00 time limit 5:00 (5:00) >>> depth time score variation (1) >>>starting thread 1 >>> 9 4.32 -0.01 1. ... Rh1 2. Kb2 Rh2+ 3. Ka3 Rh1 4. >>> Ka2 Rh2+ 5. Kb3 >>> 9-> 5.19 -0.01 1. ... Rh1 2. Kb2 Rh2+ 3. Ka3 Rh1 4. >>> Ka2 Rh2+ 5. Kb3 >>> 10 8.88 -0.01 1. ... Rh1 2. Kb2 Rh2+ 3. Ka3 Rh1 4. >>> Ka2 Rh2+ 5. Kb3 >>> 10-> 9.52 -0.01 1. ... Rh1 2. Kb2 Rh2+ 3. Ka3 Rh1 4. >>> Ka2 Rh2+ 5. Kb3 >>> 11 16.00 -0.01 1. ... Rh1 2. Kb2 Rh2+ 3. Ka3 Rh1 4. >>> Ka2 Rh2+ 5. Kb3 >>> 11-> 17.49 -0.01 1. ... Rh1 2. Kb2 Rh2+ 3. Ka3 Rh1 4. >>> Ka2 Rh2+ 5. Kb3 >>> 12 26.10 +1 1. ... Rh1 >>> 12 46.55 6.19 1. ... Rh1 2. a7 Ra1 3. Rh4+ Kg3 4. >>> Ra4 Rb1+ 5. Ka2 h2 6. a8=Q h1=Q 7. >>> Qg8+ Kf2 8. Rf4+ Ke2 9. Qc4+ Kd2 10. >>> Rd4+ Ke3 11. Qd3+ Kf2 12. Qxb1 >>> 12 1:05 -0.01 1. ... Kg4 2. Rh7 Rd2 3. a7 Rd3+ 4. >>> Kc4 Ra3 5. Kd5 h2 6. Rxh2 <EGTB> >>> 12-> 1:06 -0.01 1. ... Kg4 2. Rh7 Rd2 3. a7 Rd3+ 4. >>> Kc4 Ra3 5. Kd5 h2 6. Rxh2 <EGTB> >>> 13 1:19 -0.01 1. ... Kg4 2. Rh7 Rd2 3. a7 Rd3+ 4. >>> Kc4 Ra3 5. Kd5 h2 6. Rxh2 <EGTB> >>> 13-> 1:20 -0.01 1. ... Kg4 2. Rh7 Rd2 3. a7 Rd3+ 4. >>> Kc4 Ra3 5. Kd5 h2 6. Rxh2 <EGTB> >>> 14 1:52 -0.01 1. ... Kg4 2. Rh7 Rd2 3. a7 Rd3+ 4. >>> Kc4 Ra3 5. Kd5 h2 6. Rxh2 <EGTB> >>> 14-> 1:54 -0.01 1. ... Kg4 2. Rh7 Rd2 3. a7 Rd3+ 4. >>> Kc4 Ra3 5. Kd5 h2 6. Rxh2 <EGTB> >>>? 15 2:15 1/13* 1. ... Kg4 >>>Black(0): ? >>> time=2:22 cpu=69% mat=0 n=55576056 fh=89% nps=390K >>> ext-> chk=5027535 cap=77326 pp=396647 1rep=131850 mate=1990 >>> predicted=0 nodes=55576056 evals=10768128 50move=0 >>> endgame tablebase-> probes=62152 hits=62152 >>> SMP-> split=668 stop=65 data=7/128 cpu=1:38 elap=2:22 >>> >>>Black(1): Kg4 >>> time used: 2:22 >> >>The Dann Corbit version of Crafty 19.17 doesn't find Kg4 on my P3/933. >> >>Crafty 19.17 DC: >> 9 00:00 192.275 480.687 0.00 1. ... Rh1 2.Ka2 Rh2+ 3.Ka3 Rh1 4.a7 Ra1+ >>5.Kb2 Rxa7 6.Rxh3 Kg4 7.Rh6 >> 9 00:00 213.887 475.304 0.00 1. ... Rh1 2.Ka2 Rh2+ 3.Ka3 Rh1 4.a7 Ra1+ >>5.Kb2 Rxa7 6.Rxh3 Kg4 7.Rh6 >> 10 00:01 483.285 543.016 0.00 1. ... Rh1 2.Ka2 Rh2+ 3.Ka3 Rh1 4.a7 Ra1+ >>5.Kb2 Rxa7 6.Rxh3 Kg4 7.Rh6 Kf3 >> 10 00:01 524.248 551.840 0.00 1. ... Rh1 2.Ka2 Rh2+ 3.Ka3 Rh1 4.a7 Ra1+ >>5.Kb2 Rxa7 6.Rxh3 Kg4 7.Rh6 Kf3 >> 11 00:02 1.623.925 634.345 0.00 1. ... Rh1 2.Ka2 Rh2+ 3.Ka3 Rh1 4.a7 Ra1+ >>5.Kb2 Rxa7 6.Rxh3 Kg4 7.Rh6 Kf3 8.Kc3 >> 11 00:02 1.708.037 637.327 0.00 1. ... Rh1 2.Ka2 Rh2+ 3.Ka3 Rh1 4.a7 Ra1+ >>5.Kb2 Rxa7 6.Rxh3 Kg4 7.Rh6 Kf3 8.Kc3 >> 12 02:38 113.466.911 718.145 +6.40 1. ... Rh1 2.a7 Ra1 3.Rh4+ Ke5 4.Ra4 Rb1+ >>5.Ka2 h2 6.a8Q h1Q 7.Qe8+ Kd5 8.Qd7+ Kc5 9.Qf5+ Kd6 10.Qxb1 Qxb1+ 11.Kxb1 >> 12 03:10 132.589.812 697.841 +2.14 1. ... Re2 2.a7 Re8 3.Rxh3 Ra8 4.Rh4+ Ke3 >>5.Rh7 Kd4 6.Kb4 Kd5 7.Kb5 Kd6 >> 12 03:11 133.224.464 697.510 +2.14 1. ... Re2 2.a7 Re8 3.Rxh3 Ra8 4.Rh4+ Ke3 >>5.Rh7 Kd4 6.Kb4 Kd5 7.Kb5 Kd6 >> 13 03:31 145.665.599 690.358 +2.12 1. ... Re2 2.a7 Re8 3.Rxh3 Ra8 4.Rh7 Ke5 >>5.Kb4 Kd6 6.Kb5 Rc8 7.Rf7 Re8 8.Kb6 >> 13 03:33 146.841.018 689.394 +2.12 1. ... Re2 2.a7 Re8 3.Rxh3 Ra8 4.Rh7 Ke5 >>5.Kb4 Kd6 6.Kb5 Rc8 7.Rf7 Re8 8.Kb6 >> 14 04:16 173.957.490 679.521 +2.12 1. ... Re2 2.a7 Re8 3.Rxh3 Ra8 4.Rh7 Ke5 >>5.Kb4 Kd6 6.Kb5 Rc8 7.Rf7 Ke6 8.Rc7 Rd8 >> 14 04:20 176.897.790 680.376 +2.12 1. ... Re2 2.a7 Re8 3.Rxh3 Ra8 4.Rh7 Ke5 >>5.Kb4 Kd6 6.Kb5 Rc8 7.Rf7 Ke6 8.Rc7 Rd8 >> >>Regards >>Dave > >try the positon in the command console -- and use the word "go" , not "analyze" >-- also are you using EGTB? I am not using EGTB. What does it prove if it finds the right move using EGTB? Nothing, in my opinion. :-) Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.