Author: David Dahlem
Date: 10:03:43 10/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2004 at 12:55:29, Ed Schröder wrote: >On October 02, 2004 at 11:10:51, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On October 02, 2004 at 04:59:04, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On October 01, 2004 at 12:49:21, ThatsIt wrote: >>> >>>>Hi ! >>>> >>>>The last few weeks i have made some tests with ProDeo. >>>>First with the defaults (Sep, 04) after them with my own creations. >>>> >>>>The results until now: >>>>[played with 40moves/20min.+ 40moves/20min. + ... / 64MB HTs / >>>> without any TBs / without pb / 20 startpositions = 40 games per match >>>> on a celeron 2ghz] >>>> >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Shredder 8 09.0 - 31.0 (+ 4 =10 -26) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Shredder 8 16.5 - 23.5 (+ 9 =15 -16) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Shredder 8 20.0 - 20.0 (+14 =12 -14) >>>> >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Junior 8 17.0 - 23.0 (+11 =12 -17) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Junior 8 17.0 - 23.0 (+11 =12 -17) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Junior 8 still running >>>> >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Hiarcs 9 13.5 - 26.5 (+ 7 =13 -20) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Hiarcs 9 15.0 - 25.0 (+ 8 =14 -18) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Hiarcs 9 follow soon >>>> >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 14.5 - 25.5 (+ 5 =19 -16) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 follow soon >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 follow soon >>>> >>>>Total: >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) 54.0 aus 160 (33.75%) >>>>Pro Dep 1.0 (GS2) 48.5 aus 120 (40.41%) >>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) 20.0 aus 40 (50.00%) >>>> >>>>Changes in comparison to the default (Sep, 2004) >>>>GS2: >>>>[Bishop Value = 102] [Bishop Pair = 102] [Mobility = 120] >>>> >>>>GS2a: >>>>this will be told after the games. >>>> >>>>The games, the startpositions, more details and other stuff can be found under: >>>>http://www.pcschach.de >>>> >>>>Best >>>>Thats It >>>>(Gerhard Sonnabend / Stuttgart / Germany) >>> >>> >>>Hi Gerhard, >>> >>>Nice work. Just one remark (question), I do hope you have turned off "position >>>learning". In this type of testing (running matches from the same positions) >>>when position learning is on the learning algorithm may have played a dominant >>>role and you perhaps are wasting your valuable time because you are actually >>>testing the learning mainly. This because I have noticed that PD's position >>>learning algorithm is really good. >>> >>>If not then the results look indeed promising and encouraging. >>> >>>Keep up the good work. >>> >>>My best, >>> >>>Ed >> >>Hi Ed >> >>I realize this may not be possible, but a good idea for a future version of >>ProDeo would be for each personality to have it's own learning files. :-) >> >>Regards >>Dave > > >Hi Dave, > >That would be perfect, but imagine the disk pollution. But now that you made me >think about it what looks acceptable is something like this: > >[Position Learner = on] * off|on >[Position Learner file = teach_me.lrn] * --> new <-- > >or > >[Personality = whoops.eng] * just kidding >[Position Learner = on] * off|on >[Position Learner file = on] * off|on > >In this case when [Position Learner file = on] is set learned data will be >stored in the file whoops.lrn > >I will think about it. > >My best, > >Ed Hi Ed Good ideas! And disk pollution wouldn't be a problem for me. What about book learning, could it work in the same manner? Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.