Author: Henk Bossinade
Date: 11:49:48 10/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2004 at 15:04:44, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >On October 01, 2004 at 13:43:17, Uri Blass wrote: > >>[D]5b1k/4p1p1/4P1P1/8/8/1p2p1p1/1P2P1P1/K4B2 w - - 0 1 >> >>How much time does your program need to get perft 50 and perft 70 >> >>latest Movei after fixing perft to be able to calculate more than 20 plies >>gives >>perft 50=531,441 >>perft 70=129,140,163 > > >Hi Uri, > >here my Smirf values come (of course doing a lot analysis overhead): > > >FEN: 5b1k/4p1p1/4P1P1/8/8/1p2p1p1/1P2P1P1/K4B2 w - - 0 1 > > +-a--b--c--d--e--f--g--h-+ MS Visual Studio C++ Version 13.1 >8 | ::: ::: [b] [k]| >7 |::: ::: [p] [p] | Perft Testseries >6 | ::: :::<P>:::<P>:::| >5 |::: ::: ::: ::: | (With TT Caching 256 MB / 5-fold) >4 | ::: ::: ::: :::| >3 |:::[p]::: [p] [p] | Test #: 00 >2 | <P> :::<P>:::<P>:::| >1 |<K> ::: :::<B>::: | Break Time 1.0 Sec. >=>+-a--b--c--d--e--f--g--h-+ > >Ply Nodes all (x) all (+) Seconds >------------------------------------------------------------ >01 1 0 0 0 >02 1 0 0 0 >03 2 0 0 0 >04 2 0 0 0 >05 3 0 0 0 >06 3 0 0 0 >07 6 0 0 0 >08 6 0 0 0 >09 9 0 0 0 >10 9 0 0 0 >11 18 0 0 0 >12 18 0 0 0 >13 27 0 0 0 >14 27 0 0 0 >15 54 0 0 0 >16 54 0 0 0 >17 81 0 0 0 >18 81 0 0 0 >19 162 0 0 0 >20 162 0 0 0 >21 243 0 0 0 >22 243 0 0 0 >23 486 0 0 0 >24 486 0 0 0 >25 729 0 0 0 >26 729 0 0 0 >27 1458 0 0 0 >28 1458 0 0 0 >29 2187 0 0 0 >30 2187 0 0 0 >31 4374 0 0 0 >32 4374 0 0 0 >33 6561 0 0 0 >34 6561 0 0 0 >35 13122 0 0 0 >36 13122 0 0 0 >37 19683 0 0 0 >38 19683 0 0 0 >39 39366 0 0 0 >40 39366 0 0 0 >41 59049 0 0 0 >42 59049 0 0 0 >43 118098 0 0 0 >44 118098 0 0 0 >45 177147 0 0 0 >46 177147 0 0 0 >47 354294 0 0 0 >48 354294 0 0 0 >49 531441 0 0 0 >50 531441 0 0 0 >51 1062882 0 0 0 >52 1062882 0 0 0 >53 1594323 0 0 0 >54 1594323 0 0 0 >55 3188646 0 0 0 >56 3188646 0 0 0 >57 4782969 0 0 0 >58 4782969 0 0 0 >59 9565938 0 0 0 >60 9565938 0 0 0 >61 14348907 0 0 0 >62 14348907 0 0 0 >63 28697814 0 0 0 >64 28697814 0 0 0 >65 43046721 0 0 0 >66 43046721 0 0 0 >67 86093442 0 0 0 >68 86093442 0 0 0 >69 129140163 0 0 0 >70 129140163 0 0 0 >71 258280326 0 0 0 >72 258280326 0 0 0 >73 387420489 0 0 0 >74 387420489 0 0 0 >75 774840978 0 0 0 >76 774840978 0 0 0 >77 1162261467 0 0 0 >78 1162261467 0 0 0 >79 2324522934 0 0 0 >80 2324522934 0 0 0 >81 3486784401 0 0 0 >82 3486784401 0 0 0 >83 6973568802 0 0 0 >84 6973568802 0 0 0 >85 10460353203 0 0 0 >86 10460353203 0 0 0 >87 20920706406 0 0 0 >88 20920706406 0 0 0 >89 31381059609 0 0 0 >90 31381059609 0 0 0 >91 62762119218 0 0 0 >92 62762119218 0 0 0 >93 94143178827 0 0 0 >94 94143178827 0 0 0 >95 188286357654 0 0 0 >96 188286357654 0 0 0 >97 282429536481 0 0 0 >98 282429536481 0 0 0 >99 564859072962 0 0 0 >------------------------------------------------------------ Time measurement gives about four significant digits. Why don't you show them? hb > >Regards, Reinhard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.