Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 12:08:51 10/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2004 at 13:03:43, David Dahlem wrote: >On October 02, 2004 at 12:55:29, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On October 02, 2004 at 11:10:51, David Dahlem wrote: >> >>>On October 02, 2004 at 04:59:04, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On October 01, 2004 at 12:49:21, ThatsIt wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi ! >>>>> >>>>>The last few weeks i have made some tests with ProDeo. >>>>>First with the defaults (Sep, 04) after them with my own creations. >>>>> >>>>>The results until now: >>>>>[played with 40moves/20min.+ 40moves/20min. + ... / 64MB HTs / >>>>> without any TBs / without pb / 20 startpositions = 40 games per match >>>>> on a celeron 2ghz] >>>>> >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Shredder 8 09.0 - 31.0 (+ 4 =10 -26) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Shredder 8 16.5 - 23.5 (+ 9 =15 -16) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Shredder 8 20.0 - 20.0 (+14 =12 -14) >>>>> >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Junior 8 17.0 - 23.0 (+11 =12 -17) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Junior 8 17.0 - 23.0 (+11 =12 -17) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Junior 8 still running >>>>> >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Hiarcs 9 13.5 - 26.5 (+ 7 =13 -20) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Hiarcs 9 15.0 - 25.0 (+ 8 =14 -18) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Hiarcs 9 follow soon >>>>> >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 14.5 - 25.5 (+ 5 =19 -16) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 follow soon >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 follow soon >>>>> >>>>>Total: >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) 54.0 aus 160 (33.75%) >>>>>Pro Dep 1.0 (GS2) 48.5 aus 120 (40.41%) >>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) 20.0 aus 40 (50.00%) >>>>> >>>>>Changes in comparison to the default (Sep, 2004) >>>>>GS2: >>>>>[Bishop Value = 102] [Bishop Pair = 102] [Mobility = 120] >>>>> >>>>>GS2a: >>>>>this will be told after the games. >>>>> >>>>>The games, the startpositions, more details and other stuff can be found under: >>>>>http://www.pcschach.de >>>>> >>>>>Best >>>>>Thats It >>>>>(Gerhard Sonnabend / Stuttgart / Germany) >>>> >>>> >>>>Hi Gerhard, >>>> >>>>Nice work. Just one remark (question), I do hope you have turned off "position >>>>learning". In this type of testing (running matches from the same positions) >>>>when position learning is on the learning algorithm may have played a dominant >>>>role and you perhaps are wasting your valuable time because you are actually >>>>testing the learning mainly. This because I have noticed that PD's position >>>>learning algorithm is really good. >>>> >>>>If not then the results look indeed promising and encouraging. >>>> >>>>Keep up the good work. >>>> >>>>My best, >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>>Hi Ed >>> >>>I realize this may not be possible, but a good idea for a future version of >>>ProDeo would be for each personality to have it's own learning files. :-) >>> >>>Regards >>>Dave >> >> >>Hi Dave, >> >>That would be perfect, but imagine the disk pollution. But now that you made me >>think about it what looks acceptable is something like this: >> >>[Position Learner = on] * off|on >>[Position Learner file = teach_me.lrn] * --> new <-- >> >>or >> >>[Personality = whoops.eng] * just kidding >>[Position Learner = on] * off|on >>[Position Learner file = on] * off|on >> >>In this case when [Position Learner file = on] is set learned data will be >>stored in the file whoops.lrn >> >>I will think about it. >> >>My best, >> >>Ed >Hi Ed > >Good ideas! And disk pollution wouldn't be a problem for me. What about book >learning, could it work in the same manner? Everything is possible, but book-learning would cost 1 MB per learning file. My best, Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.