Author: David Dahlem
Date: 12:37:02 10/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2004 at 15:08:51, Ed Schröder wrote: >On October 02, 2004 at 13:03:43, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On October 02, 2004 at 12:55:29, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On October 02, 2004 at 11:10:51, David Dahlem wrote: >>> >>>>On October 02, 2004 at 04:59:04, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 01, 2004 at 12:49:21, ThatsIt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hi ! >>>>>> >>>>>>The last few weeks i have made some tests with ProDeo. >>>>>>First with the defaults (Sep, 04) after them with my own creations. >>>>>> >>>>>>The results until now: >>>>>>[played with 40moves/20min.+ 40moves/20min. + ... / 64MB HTs / >>>>>> without any TBs / without pb / 20 startpositions = 40 games per match >>>>>> on a celeron 2ghz] >>>>>> >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Shredder 8 09.0 - 31.0 (+ 4 =10 -26) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Shredder 8 16.5 - 23.5 (+ 9 =15 -16) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Shredder 8 20.0 - 20.0 (+14 =12 -14) >>>>>> >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Junior 8 17.0 - 23.0 (+11 =12 -17) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Junior 8 17.0 - 23.0 (+11 =12 -17) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Junior 8 still running >>>>>> >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Hiarcs 9 13.5 - 26.5 (+ 7 =13 -20) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Hiarcs 9 15.0 - 25.0 (+ 8 =14 -18) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Hiarcs 9 follow soon >>>>>> >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 14.5 - 25.5 (+ 5 =19 -16) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 follow soon >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) vs Fritz 8.0.0.26 follow soon >>>>>> >>>>>>Total: >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (default) 54.0 aus 160 (33.75%) >>>>>>Pro Dep 1.0 (GS2) 48.5 aus 120 (40.41%) >>>>>>Pro Deo 1.0 (GS2a) 20.0 aus 40 (50.00%) >>>>>> >>>>>>Changes in comparison to the default (Sep, 2004) >>>>>>GS2: >>>>>>[Bishop Value = 102] [Bishop Pair = 102] [Mobility = 120] >>>>>> >>>>>>GS2a: >>>>>>this will be told after the games. >>>>>> >>>>>>The games, the startpositions, more details and other stuff can be found under: >>>>>>http://www.pcschach.de >>>>>> >>>>>>Best >>>>>>Thats It >>>>>>(Gerhard Sonnabend / Stuttgart / Germany) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Hi Gerhard, >>>>> >>>>>Nice work. Just one remark (question), I do hope you have turned off "position >>>>>learning". In this type of testing (running matches from the same positions) >>>>>when position learning is on the learning algorithm may have played a dominant >>>>>role and you perhaps are wasting your valuable time because you are actually >>>>>testing the learning mainly. This because I have noticed that PD's position >>>>>learning algorithm is really good. >>>>> >>>>>If not then the results look indeed promising and encouraging. >>>>> >>>>>Keep up the good work. >>>>> >>>>>My best, >>>>> >>>>>Ed >>>> >>>>Hi Ed >>>> >>>>I realize this may not be possible, but a good idea for a future version of >>>>ProDeo would be for each personality to have it's own learning files. :-) >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Dave >>> >>> >>>Hi Dave, >>> >>>That would be perfect, but imagine the disk pollution. But now that you made me >>>think about it what looks acceptable is something like this: >>> >>>[Position Learner = on] * off|on >>>[Position Learner file = teach_me.lrn] * --> new <-- >>> >>>or >>> >>>[Personality = whoops.eng] * just kidding >>>[Position Learner = on] * off|on >>>[Position Learner file = on] * off|on >>> >>>In this case when [Position Learner file = on] is set learned data will be >>>stored in the file whoops.lrn >>> >>>I will think about it. >>> >>>My best, >>> >>>Ed > >>Hi Ed >> >>Good ideas! And disk pollution wouldn't be a problem for me. What about book >>learning, could it work in the same manner? > >Everything is possible, but book-learning would cost 1 MB per learning file. > >My best, > >Ed Ok, since position learning is really good in ProDeo, you must implement each personalitys own learning files, immediately. :-)) Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.