Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pro Deo 1.0 - testseries

Author: Daniel Jackson

Date: 12:42:30 10/02/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 02, 2004 at 04:59:01, Chris Welty wrote:

>On October 02, 2004 at 00:13:09, Daniel Jackson wrote:
>
>>Bet you wouldn't believe that a stronger program could lose 10 straight games
>>yet it has happened.
>
>Of course it will happen if you play enough games.

Yes, and it has happened right from the start! I remember Bruce Moreland being
surprised by this nearly 4 years ago.
>
>> Simply put there isn't enough games to be certain of anything,
>>but it appears that these settings might be the reason...and I say might...we
>>don't know yet..
>>
>>I don't know and you don't know....could be book wins and losses...we don't
>>know, we have no games to look at...see to see why this result occurred.
>
>We can never be 100% certain, however enough games were played that the result
>is statistically meaningful. It is not within the margin of error.
>
>More games always help of course.

Yes, a lot more games...I don't think we disagree as much as you think, and the
point is you need to be over 95% certain or better IMO.

The basic results do look good, so we'll see...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.