Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 18:31:00 10/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2004 at 13:57:46, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On October 03, 2004 at 10:36:14, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >>On October 03, 2004 at 04:06:11, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >> >>>I'd like to thank Richard Pijl, Gerd Isenberg and others for their many good >>>suggestions when I posted on this topic a month or so ago. After some 3500 >>>games and assorted other tests I have not been able to establish any clear >>>improvement with a pin aware SEE - the increase in accuracy and the loss of >>>speed seem to be a wash. I've given up for now but I still have my (several) >>>pin aware SEE routines which I may revisit at a later date. >>> >>>Dan H. >> >>How about an X-RAY aware pin? Bob said that is important. > >My first SEE was just an InCheck to see if the capturing piece could be >recaptured. Not too accurate, but fast. Then I added exchanges on the square. >Then X-Ray. Now I tried pins. I can't claim any of them work any better than >my first simple SEE. > >Slightly frustrated >Dan H Wow! You need a dose of B-O-B!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.