Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 10:54:46 10/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2004 at 10:33:00, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 04, 2004 at 09:28:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: > >>On October 04, 2004 at 02:07:12, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2004 at 01:12:58, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>> >>>>CM10 Default on a slow PIII 500 can't hold Black's position, even before Kramnik >>>>made errors. >>>> >>>>I don't trust CM10 to handle this endgame, still it does show that 15..a6 >>>>followed by 16.Bxa6 is better for White and is difficult to defend. >>>>BTW CM10 couldn't find 16.Bxa6, I had to manually input the moves, then set it >>>>to autoplay. If there is a draw, I'll have to start at 24.gxf3 or even earlier. >>>>This exchange to the endgame isn't particularly good. It may be down right >>>>terrible!? >>> >>>Can you show the way that chessmaster beat itself after 62...Be1 >>>People claimed in another thread that Kramnik could save a draw by 62...Be1 and >>>I saw no contradiction. >>> >>>Uri >> >>The point is the line is a bit risky...what's the point to say this move draws, >>when it is a position no one in their right mind would want to defend? > >Why do you say noone? > >If a player is strong in endgames he may prefer to defend inferior endgame and >not play the middlegame. > >Uri That's not the point....the point is Don't Play Inferior Lines and Chess, period! Kramnik must have known the dangers, that is arrogance if he believes he can win the match with his endgame technique alone. He risks losing match!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.