Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 20:00:29 10/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2004 at 19:04:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 04, 2004 at 13:54:46, Daniel Jackson wrote: > >>On October 04, 2004 at 10:33:00, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2004 at 09:28:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>> >>>>On October 04, 2004 at 02:07:12, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 01:12:58, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>CM10 Default on a slow PIII 500 can't hold Black's position, even before Kramnik >>>>>>made errors. >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't trust CM10 to handle this endgame, still it does show that 15..a6 >>>>>>followed by 16.Bxa6 is better for White and is difficult to defend. >>>>>>BTW CM10 couldn't find 16.Bxa6, I had to manually input the moves, then set it >>>>>>to autoplay. If there is a draw, I'll have to start at 24.gxf3 or even earlier. >>>>>>This exchange to the endgame isn't particularly good. It may be down right >>>>>>terrible!? >>>>> >>>>>Can you show the way that chessmaster beat itself after 62...Be1 >>>>>People claimed in another thread that Kramnik could save a draw by 62...Be1 and >>>>>I saw no contradiction. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>The point is the line is a bit risky...what's the point to say this move draws, >>>>when it is a position no one in their right mind would want to defend? >>> >>>Why do you say noone? >>> >>>If a player is strong in endgames he may prefer to defend inferior endgame and >>>not play the middlegame. >>> >>>Uri >> >>That's not the point....the point is Don't Play Inferior Lines and Chess, >>period! Kramnik must have known the dangers, that is arrogance if he believes he >>can win the match with his endgame technique alone. >> >>He risks losing match! > >It seems that Kramnik simply does not know to play endgames well enough but if a >player knows to play endgames well enough then there is no danger. Huh? That is Kramnik's strength. > >The fact that kramnik may lose the match is a good thing because I have reasons >not to like kramnik. >Uri I don't follow you here? What does liking or disliking have to do with it? I think Kramnik should play Kasparov....he owes Kasparov a re-match, that's how it was done before chess became corrupt! Now, without reunification the WCC is worse than a bad joke!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.