Author: Uri Blass
Date: 20:24:29 10/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2004 at 23:00:29, Daniel Jackson wrote: >On October 04, 2004 at 19:04:04, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 04, 2004 at 13:54:46, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2004 at 10:33:00, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On October 04, 2004 at 09:28:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 02:07:12, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 01:12:58, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>CM10 Default on a slow PIII 500 can't hold Black's position, even before Kramnik >>>>>>>made errors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I don't trust CM10 to handle this endgame, still it does show that 15..a6 >>>>>>>followed by 16.Bxa6 is better for White and is difficult to defend. >>>>>>>BTW CM10 couldn't find 16.Bxa6, I had to manually input the moves, then set it >>>>>>>to autoplay. If there is a draw, I'll have to start at 24.gxf3 or even earlier. >>>>>>>This exchange to the endgame isn't particularly good. It may be down right >>>>>>>terrible!? >>>>>> >>>>>>Can you show the way that chessmaster beat itself after 62...Be1 >>>>>>People claimed in another thread that Kramnik could save a draw by 62...Be1 and >>>>>>I saw no contradiction. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>>The point is the line is a bit risky...what's the point to say this move draws, >>>>>when it is a position no one in their right mind would want to defend? >>>> >>>>Why do you say noone? >>>> >>>>If a player is strong in endgames he may prefer to defend inferior endgame and >>>>not play the middlegame. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>That's not the point....the point is Don't Play Inferior Lines and Chess, >>>period! Kramnik must have known the dangers, that is arrogance if he believes he >>>can win the match with his endgame technique alone. >>> >>>He risks losing match! >> >>It seems that Kramnik simply does not know to play endgames well enough but if a >>player knows to play endgames well enough then there is no danger. > >Huh? That is Kramnik's strength. It seems that he is not strong enough in the endgames based on the game. >> >>The fact that kramnik may lose the match is a good thing because I have reasons >>not to like kramnik. >>Uri > >I don't follow you here? What does liking or disliking have to do with it? > >I think Kramnik should play Kasparov....he owes Kasparov a re-match, that's how >it was done before chess became corrupt! No I think shirov should play kasparov Shirov beated kramnik so kramnik did not deserve to play kasparov in the first place so he does not deserve a rematch. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.