Author: Cliff Sears
Date: 02:18:33 10/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
7+2 0:00 0% 1.Bxb4 Gambit Shredder
2+7 0:01 21% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
2+7 0:01 45% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
2+7 0:01 51% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
3+7 0:01 62% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
3+7 0:01 63% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+7 0:01 71% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+7 0:01 94% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+7 0:01 99% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
5+7 0:01 82% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
6+7 0:01 63% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
6+7 0:01 52% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+7 0:01 51% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
8+7 0:02 49% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
8+7 0:02 41% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
8+8 0:03 37% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
9+8 0:03 48% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
9+8 0:05 64% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+9 0:08 58% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+9 0:08 35% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+9 0:10 22% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
best move: Ba3xb4 time: 0:12.927 min n/s: 60.799
Position: 1 1
1+1 0:01 30% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
2+1 0:01 31% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
3+1 0:01 41% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
3+1 0:01 43% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+1 0:01 50% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+1 0:01 74% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+1 0:01 78% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
5+1 0:01 61% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
6+1 0:01 43% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
6+1 0:01 31% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+1 0:01 30% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+1 0:01 32% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+1 0:03 30% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+1 0:03 23% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+2 0:03 23% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+3 0:03 23% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+4 0:03 20% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+5 0:03 9% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+5 0:04 13% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
5+7 0:04 3% 1.Bxb4 Gambit Shredder
5+7 0:04 5% 1.Bxb4 Gambit Shredder
7+6 0:04 17% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+6 0:04 35% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+7 0:04 27% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+8 0:04 34% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
7+8 0:04 45% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
8+8 0:06 43% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
8+8 0:06 35% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
9+8 0:06 51% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
9+9 0:07 36% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+9 0:09 30% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+10 0:10 17% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+10 0:13 17% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
11+10 0:21 40% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
11+11 0:27 39% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
11+11 0:27 46% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
best move: Ba3xb4 time: 0:28.891 min n/s: 59.154
4+5 0:01 66% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+6 0:01 66% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
4+7 0:01 55% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
5+8 0:03 38% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
6+8 0:03 20% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
6+8 0:03 9% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
8+7 0:03 5% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
8+8 0:03 6% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
8+8 0:03 10% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
8+9 0:03 9% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
9+8 0:03 26% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
9+8 0:03 43% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
9+8 0:05 59% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
9+9 0:06 48% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+9 0:08 58% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+9 0:08 52% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
10+9 0:10 39% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
11+10 0:16 20% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
11+10 0:21 43% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
11+11 0:27 42% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
11+11 0:27 21% 1.Bxb4 Really Shredder?
best move: Ba3xb4 time: 0:27.160 min n/s: 60.284
6+7 0:01 36% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
6+7 0:01 28% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
7+8 0:02 13% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
7+8 0:03 23% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
8+8 0:05 32% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
8+9 0:08 19% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
10+9 0:12 7% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
9+10 0:13 2% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
10+9 0:17 17% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
9+11 0:25 2% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
10+11 0:29 5% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
11+10 0:43 13% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
12+10 1:07 14% 1.Bxb4 Kamikaze Shredder
11+12 1:49 24% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
11+12 2:47 44% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
11+12 3:12 28% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
11+12 3:55 11% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
11+12 4:42 10% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
13+12 6:10 10% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
13+12 6:39 11% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
13+12 8:17 22% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
14+12 35:35 62% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
14+12 55:22 98% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
14+12 56:20 48% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
14+12 89:41 13% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
13+14 165:10 52% 1.e5 Gandalf 4.32UCI
14+13 188:41 91% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
14+13 193:52 85% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
15+13 196:39 80% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
15+13 204:52 56% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
14+15 395:35 100% 1.Bxb4 Gandalf 4.32UCI
15+14 412:34 55% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
15+14 430:04 56% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
15+14 460:29 80% 1.Nf5 Kamikaze Shredder
14+15 597:43 100% 1.e5 Gandalf 4.32UCI
On October 04, 2004 at 16:51:50, Eelco de Groot wrote:
>
>[Event "Wch-Comp-11 Maastricht"]
>[Site "Maastricht"]
>[Date "19/8/2001"]
>[Round "2"]
>[White "Ferret 2xAMD 1.2"]
>[Black "Gandalf 5.0"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>
>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3
>O-O 9. h3 Bb7
>10. d4 Re8 11. Nbd2 Bf8 12. a4 h6 13. Bc2 exd4 14. cxd4 Nb4 15. Bb1 g6 16. Ra3
>Bg7 17. Nh2
>c5 18. d5 Nd7 19. Ndf3 h5 20. Nf1 bxa4 21. Qxa4 a5 22. Ne3 Ba6 23. Qd1 c4 24.
>Nd2 Ne5 25. Rf1
>Qb6 26. Kh2 c3 27. bxc3 Bxf1 28. Qxf1 Na6 29. Rb3 Qc7 30. c4 Nb4 31. Qd1 Nd7 32.
>Nef1
>Nc5 33. Rf3 a4 34. Kg1 Reb8 35. Rg3 Qe7 36. Ba3 Be5 37. Re3 Bf4 38. Rf3 Qe5 39.
>h4 Bh6
>40. Ne3 Nb3 41. Ndf1 Bxe3 42. Nxe3 Qa1
>
>[D]rr4k1/5p2/3p2p1/3P3p/pnP1P2P/Bn2NR2/5PP1/qB1Q2K1 w - - 1 1
>
>43. e5 Qxa3
>
>[D]rr4k1/5p2/3p2p1/3PP2p/pnP4P/qn2NR2/5PP1/1B1Q2K1 w - - 0 1
>
>
>44. Rxf7 Kxf7 45. Qf3+ Kg8 46. Qf6
>Qa1 47. Qe6+ Kf8 48. Qxd6+ Ke8 49. Qxg6+ Kd8 50. d6 Kc8 51. Qf7 Qxb1+ 52. Kh2
>Na6 53. e6
>Nbc5 54. e7 Qe4 55. d7+ Nxd7 56. e8Q+ Qxe8 57. Qxe8+ Kc7 58. Nd5+ Kc6 59. Qe6+
>Kc5 60. Qxd7
>a3 61. Qf5 Kxc4 62. Ne3+ Kc3 63. Qc2+ Kb4 64. Qc4+ Ka5 65. Qc3+ Kb5 66. Qb3+ Kc6
>67. Qa4+
>Kb6 68. Qxa3 Rh8 69. Qd6+ Kb5 70. Qe5+ Nc5 71. Qb2+ Kc6 72. Qf6+ Kb5 73. Nd5
>Rhc8 74. Qb2+
>Kc6 75. Ne7+ 1-0
>
>Hello, I am curious if there are programs that can find Ferret's 43.e5! in the
>first diagram, in reasonable time? You probably have to have some sort of
>singular extensions to play 43.e5! even if then you then don't see 44.Rxf7 yet.
>
>Rebel 12 could find e5 with its singular extensions enabled, but the searchtree
>in Rebel 12 would often grow out of control at ply>12 . Programs with singular
>extensions, like Bruce Moreland's Ferret have the advantage here, but is it
>findable with other extensions?
>
>My own current settings for Pro Deo do play 44.Rxf7! but only after 16 minutes,
>lots of nondefault extensions
>
>[Pruning = MISC_30]* extend singular checks , [Extensions (remaining)= 15] -not
>sure this last one is right as I remember these remaining Rebel extensions were
>bitsettings, not normal settings?-
>
>and big minusscore on my Celeron 500MHz, 43.e4-e5 I can't get yet. (43.Ba3xb4
>and 43.Ne3-f5 are other choices but I'm afraid these only lead to a lost game).
>
>
>Pro Deo 1.0 at move 44, custom settings:
>00:16:44.8 -3,52 12 162748792 Rxf7 Kxf7 Qf3+ Kg8 Qe4 Qc1+ Kh2 Qxb1 Qxb1
>00:16:44 12.15 -3.52 44.Rxf7 Kxf7 45.Qf3 Kg8 46.Qe4 Qc1 47.Kh2 Qxb1
>48.Qxb1
>
>Is Ferret the only one to find the winning continuation quickly ?
>
>Regards, Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.