Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 03:29:51 10/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2004 at 00:09:29, Daniel Jackson wrote: >On October 04, 2004 at 23:24:29, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 04, 2004 at 23:00:29, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2004 at 19:04:04, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On October 04, 2004 at 13:54:46, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 10:33:00, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 09:28:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 02:07:12, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 01:12:58, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>CM10 Default on a slow PIII 500 can't hold Black's position, even before Kramnik >>>>>>>>>made errors. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I don't trust CM10 to handle this endgame, still it does show that 15..a6 >>>>>>>>>followed by 16.Bxa6 is better for White and is difficult to defend. >>>>>>>>>BTW CM10 couldn't find 16.Bxa6, I had to manually input the moves, then set it >>>>>>>>>to autoplay. If there is a draw, I'll have to start at 24.gxf3 or even earlier. >>>>>>>>>This exchange to the endgame isn't particularly good. It may be down right >>>>>>>>>terrible!? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Can you show the way that chessmaster beat itself after 62...Be1 >>>>>>>>People claimed in another thread that Kramnik could save a draw by 62...Be1 and >>>>>>>>I saw no contradiction. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The point is the line is a bit risky...what's the point to say this move draws, >>>>>>>when it is a position no one in their right mind would want to defend? >>>>>> >>>>>>Why do you say noone? >>>>>> >>>>>>If a player is strong in endgames he may prefer to defend inferior endgame and >>>>>>not play the middlegame. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>>That's not the point....the point is Don't Play Inferior Lines and Chess, >>>>>period! Kramnik must have known the dangers, that is arrogance if he believes he >>>>>can win the match with his endgame technique alone. >>>>> >>>>>He risks losing match! >>>> >>>>It seems that Kramnik simply does not know to play endgames well enough but if a >>>>player knows to play endgames well enough then there is no danger. >>> >>>Huh? That is Kramnik's strength. >> >>It seems that he is not strong enough in the endgames based on the game. > >Based on one game? You're joking right? >> >>>> >>>>The fact that kramnik may lose the match is a good thing because I have reasons >>>>not to like kramnik. >>>>Uri >>> >>>I don't follow you here? What does liking or disliking have to do with it? >>> >>>I think Kramnik should play Kasparov....he owes Kasparov a re-match, that's how >>>it was done before chess became corrupt! >> >>No > >YES! That is How it is Done!! >> >>I think shirov should play kasparov > >Too Late....Kramnik played Kasparov, End of Story! > >Shirov is no match for Kasparov anyway...I'll only concede that Shirov should >have played Kasporov first....but Kasparov wanted a match and it was setteled, >but I understand your point. >> >>Shirov beated kramnik so kramnik did not deserve to play kasparov in the first >>place so he does not deserve a rematch. > >Maybe so...actually I agree but that's not what happened. The best we can hope >for is Kramnik wins and after Kasparov regains the FIDE WCC then he can redeem >himself by beating Kramnik, leaving no room for doubt Who is the WCC!! The days of Kasparovs dominance are long time ago. It is high time to realize that. >> >>Uri > >That would not only make history, it may save chess on the international level!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.