Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 03:33:53 01/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 1999 at 05:38:34, Jouni Uski wrote: >I cannot resist to write some comments: > >1) There seems to be 3 category of programs: first 5 (H7-F532), second 3 > R10-N99a) and the last 2 (G6 and CR). But of course 90 games is too few... > >2) I have theory about M8 poor perfomance in SSDF. It need more speed, than > 200 MMX gives. With 333-400 PII it's been playing much better and according > to CSS magazine Mchess benefits about K6-2 prosessor very much. It's > running whole 40 % faster, than in equivalent PII! But then, why is Mchess 8 doing so well here at 40/40? To me, it makes sense to think that M8 will do better than M6/7 against humans and computers. It still plays very active, but more sensible than before, so fast searchers won't take advantage of the risky play so typical in M6/7. I noticed that Mchess 8 also did very well in a tournament posted by Rudolf Klamert. I don't know why it didn't do well in the SSDF games. Maybe Marty has something to say about all this. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.