Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: mate threat extension/null move

Author: Steve Maughan

Date: 06:21:54 10/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


>  value = -search(bd,sdepth-1-reduction,ply,-beta+WACBOOST,-beta+1+WACBOOST,
>	mvstr,SAVETOP,verify,REDUCENOTOK,checked) + WACBOOST;


So instead of doing a null move search around beta, you're doing a null move
search at Beta - WACBOOST, and then adding WACBOOST so as to potentially get a
cutoff with any fail high from the modified search.  I assume that the modified
search will fail high 'easier' than a normal Null move search and the assumption
is that there should be a move that has an incremental value of > WACBOOST - is
this correct?

I haven't seen this idea before.  Is it new?  Has it been documented before?  Do
you have any data on how it performs in tactical positions and gameplay?



This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.