Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 09:07:16 10/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2004 at 11:12:05, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 05, 2004 at 08:01:00, Daniel Jackson wrote: > >>On October 05, 2004 at 06:29:51, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On October 05, 2004 at 00:09:29, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>> >>>>On October 04, 2004 at 23:24:29, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 23:00:29, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 19:04:04, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 13:54:46, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 10:33:00, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 09:28:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 02:07:12, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On October 04, 2004 at 01:12:58, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>CM10 Default on a slow PIII 500 can't hold Black's position, even before Kramnik >>>>>>>>>>>>made errors. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I don't trust CM10 to handle this endgame, still it does show that 15..a6 >>>>>>>>>>>>followed by 16.Bxa6 is better for White and is difficult to defend. >>>>>>>>>>>>BTW CM10 couldn't find 16.Bxa6, I had to manually input the moves, then set it >>>>>>>>>>>>to autoplay. If there is a draw, I'll have to start at 24.gxf3 or even earlier. >>>>>>>>>>>>This exchange to the endgame isn't particularly good. It may be down right >>>>>>>>>>>>terrible!? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Can you show the way that chessmaster beat itself after 62...Be1 >>>>>>>>>>>People claimed in another thread that Kramnik could save a draw by 62...Be1 and >>>>>>>>>>>I saw no contradiction. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>The point is the line is a bit risky...what's the point to say this move draws, >>>>>>>>>>when it is a position no one in their right mind would want to defend? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Why do you say noone? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>If a player is strong in endgames he may prefer to defend inferior endgame and >>>>>>>>>not play the middlegame. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That's not the point....the point is Don't Play Inferior Lines and Chess, >>>>>>>>period! Kramnik must have known the dangers, that is arrogance if he believes he >>>>>>>>can win the match with his endgame technique alone. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>He risks losing match! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It seems that Kramnik simply does not know to play endgames well enough but if a >>>>>>>player knows to play endgames well enough then there is no danger. >>>>>> >>>>>>Huh? That is Kramnik's strength. >>>>> >>>>>It seems that he is not strong enough in the endgames based on the game. >>>> >>>>Based on one game? You're joking right? >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The fact that kramnik may lose the match is a good thing because I have reasons >>>>>>>not to like kramnik. >>>>>>>Uri >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't follow you here? What does liking or disliking have to do with it? >>>>>> >>>>>>I think Kramnik should play Kasparov....he owes Kasparov a re-match, that's how >>>>>>it was done before chess became corrupt! >>>>> >>>>>No >>>> >>>>YES! That is How it is Done!! >>>>> >>>>>I think shirov should play kasparov >>>> >>>>Too Late....Kramnik played Kasparov, End of Story! >>>> >>>>Shirov is no match for Kasparov anyway...I'll only concede that Shirov should >>>>have played Kasporov first....but Kasparov wanted a match and it was setteled, >>>>but I understand your point. >>>>> >>>>>Shirov beated kramnik so kramnik did not deserve to play kasparov in the first >>>>>place so he does not deserve a rematch. >>>> >>>>Maybe so...actually I agree but that's not what happened. The best we can hope >>>>for is Kramnik wins and after Kasparov regains the FIDE WCC then he can redeem >>>>himself by beating Kramnik, leaving no room for doubt Who is the WCC!! >>> >>>The days of Kasparovs dominance are long time ago. >>>It is high time to realize that. >> >>Who are you to say this....Kasparov will win the FIDE WCC, anyone who knows >>anything about chess knows this! >> >>The tough part will be beating Kramnik...unless Leko wins...then Kasparov will >>almost certainly win! > >I do not agree. >I think Leko has not less chances than kasparov in case of beating kramnik. > >Leko is still young and can make progress more than kasparov and in case of >beating kramnik he will also have the motivation to do it. > >Uri You never agree and you're never right!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.